Secure your business from login to chargeback
Stop fraud, break down data silos, and lower friction with Sift.
- Achieve up to 285% ROI
- Increase user acceptance rates up to 99%
- Drop time spent on manual review up to 80%
Q4 2023 Digital Trust & Safety Index
Dispute data, consumer insights, and emerging trends
The current state of disputes
Amid multiple global crises, stubborn inflation, and still-high interest rates, global economic growth remains slow at a projected 3% in 2023, down from 3.5% in 2022. In flagging economic times, many businesses turn their focus to profitability—searching for ways to keep costs low and prevent losses. At the same time, economic stressors have a direct impact on fraud, driving up abuse rates for many merchants.
Fraudulent transactions and the resulting chargebacks are some of the most common forms of online fraud no matter the economic climate, but can be exacerbated when markets face uncertainty. Disputes are a universal source of frustration for businesses looking to control profit loss, as they're difficult to predict and easy for anyone to exploit.
Merchants estimate that credit card chargebacks will cost them $100 billion by the close of 2023, an expected outcome after the average cost of a dispute rose 16% last year.And with average transaction amounts trending upward by 67% during Q1-Q3 2023 vs. Q1-Q3 2022 across the Sift network, this could spell more expensive chargebacks in 2024.
44%
of U.S. consumers contested a purchase because it was fraudulently made by someone else using their payment information.
True fraud accounts for less than half of disputes
Disputes come in many forms and can be caused by true fraud, first-party fraud, or merchant error, making them particularly difficult to predict and prevent. While true fraud disputes are the result of fraudulent purchases being disputed by the legitimate cardholder, first-party fraud (also known as friendly fraud) occurs when the legitimate cardholder is the one committing fraud, intentionally or not.
These first-party fraud disputes could be the result of an honest mistake, like a family member making a purchase without notifying the cardholder—or a consumer intentionally filing a chargeback in order to get their money back while keeping their purchase. First-party fraud is the most common kind of chargeback, with true fraud disputes accounting for less than half of all disputes filed by consumers surveyed* by Sift.
Consumers engage in first-party fraud to get their money back
Despite the economy holding steady, many consumers still feel financial strain as prices and interest rates remain high. In times of financial stress, consumers are more likely to find creative ways to secure the best deals and get the most out of their money, including by participating in first-party fraud.
This economic environment, coupled with the growing democratization of fraud, is leading to more consumers participating in the Fraud Economy. This trend is lowering the barrier to entry to commit fraud, opening up opportunities for the average consumer to learn and buy fraud tips and guides across the internet. New-age “fraud influencers” are even taking to popular social media sites to advertise and sell their tactics, making it accessible for anyone to participate in fraudulent activity online.
We're seeing this play out with people taking advantage of the dispute process and their consumer protections, with more than one in four dispute filers initiating a chargeback for an item they received and were satisfied with in order to keep the item or service and get their money back.
These consumers likely knew their credit card company would cover the cost if they filed a dispute, making the business liable for the card-not-present dispute losses unless the business can come up with compelling evidence to hold the consumer responsible.
Access the full report
Your information will be used to contact you about our service and subscribe you to our direct marketing communications.You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Please see ourWebsite Privacy Notice.
Younger generations are more willing to commit first-party fraud
There's a generational divide when it comes to committing first-party fraud. The data shows that younger consumers are the most likely to file a fraud dispute for a transaction they made even though they received the item and were satisfied with their purchase.
The likelihood of committing first-party fraud is also inversely correlated with age—the older the generation, the less likely they are to engage in this form of fraud. This could be due to some members of younger generations being unaware that their actions are fraudulent and filing a chargeback instead of dealing with strict return policies. Others could be committing fraud intentionally, either to get the money back, or because of a negative experience with the business.
Percentage of each generation that admits to engaging in first-party fraud
Gen Z
Millennials
Generation X
Baby Boomers
Silent Generation
We're seeing a trend of younger generations increasingly taking advantage of consumer-friendly chargeback protections. This should serve as a wake-up call for businesses to implement a proactive fraud strategy and end-to-end dispute management process in order to preserve profitability.
Rebecca Alter, Trust and Safety Architect at Sift
A modest rise in overall disputes meets skyrocketing vertical-specific rates
Across the Sift network, dispute rates rose a moderate 6% YoY in Q1 2023 vs. Q1 2022—the three months following the holiday spending rush known as chargeback season. Several key verticals saw massive jumps in chargeback rates, including in the ticketing industry. Reselling is pervasive in this industry, with both consumers and fraudsters trying to make a profit off highly sought-after tickets in short supply.
Add consumer frustration over ticketing monopolies' high prices, fees, and botched presale scandals, and it becomes clear that the ticketing industry has work to do when it comes to optimizing the customer experience and preventing fraudulent activity.
Q1 2022
Q12023
↑6%
increase in average chargeback rate in Q1 2023 vs. Q1 2022.
Industries with highest increase in chargeback rates
Ticketing
622%
Loyalty
189%
Remittances
128%
Marketplaces
109%
Food ordering & delivery
31%
Average dispute amounts are on the rise in select verticals
The average chargeback value in Q1 2023 was $388.70, up slightly from $384.60 in Q1 2022 across the Sift network. However, some industries saw much more dramatic increases. Transportation, for example, experienced a significant 367% spike in chargeback values YoY in Q1 2023. This could largely be attributed to the surge in post-pandemic travel and rising airline prices, coupled with rampant delays and cancellations due to weather during the holidays last year, leading to more expensive disputes.
Q1 2022
Q12023
$388.70
= the average chargeback value in Q1 2023, up slightly from $384.60 in Q1 2022.
Select verticals see rising chargeback values
Transportation
367%
Digital Wallets
29%
Digital Goods & Services
17%
Consumer insights on unauthorized purchases and disputes
The current dispute landscape is complex, and defined by industry-specific factors. Card-not-present (CNP) transactions made online are particularly likely to result in disputes due to the challenges of user verification, consumer expectation, and physical evidence, such as proof of delivery.
Historically, certain industries and types of items have been more susceptible to chargebacks, such as digital goods and services that have a high fraud rate due to the quick nature of transactions limiting time for manual review, coupled with the lack of shipping address verification. But recent consumer data shows a greater variety of purchases leading to chargebacks.
Consumers' most common disputes: First-party fraud, food delivery, and FaaS
We see a growing trend of more everyday items being disputed by shoppers, partially due to it being easier now than ever for anyone, regardless of technical skill, to participate in malicious activity through the accessibility of fraud tools and technology.
One example of this is on the deep web, which solicits a growing number of on-demand fraud-as-a-service (FaaS) tools and services that anyone can purchase in order to commit fraud.
Percent of consumers who have filed a dispute on common purchases
- Clothing & Accessories
- Subscriptions
- Groceries
- Electronics and Appliances
- Food
Deliveries
27%clothing and accessories
Retail items purchased online have a higher rate of consumer dissatisfaction, delivery issues, and first-party fraud. Luxury or higher-priced items are also easy to resell for profit.
19%subscriptions for digital goods
Companies are making it more difficult to cancel recurring subscriptions. Consumers frequently dispute a service charge they originally signed up for but didn't want to continue.
14%groceries
Due to the perishable nature of groceries, there's a higher rate of consumer dissatisfaction. Groceries are also a necessity that people are willing to use stolen funds to attain.
13%electronics and appliances
These items can easily be damaged during shipping or not live up to consumer expectations. Highly sought after electronics and pricey appliances are also easy items to resell for profit.
12%food deliveries
There's a higher rate of consumer dissatisfaction or delivery issues with online food purchases. It's also common for fraudsters to use forums like Telegram to purchase food and beverage orders on behalf of customers at a reduced price, using stolen payment information.
23%
of consumers who filed a dispute with a business due to fraud were subsequently the victim of additional online fraud, including:
- 62% additional payment fraud
- 21% account takeover
- 17% increased spam/scam messages
Payment fraud paves the way for downstream abuse
Nearly one out of four (23%) consumers faced additional fraudulent activity after dealing with a fraudulent charge and the process of filing a dispute. These additional forms of fraud could have been committed at the same time, leaving the consumer little time to act—or in some cases, the consumer may not have noticed the fraudulent activity in time to cancel their credit cards, other forms of payment, or change their passwords.
41%
would permanently stop shopping with a business if someone made a fraudulent purchase with their credit card or payment information.
Unauthorized transactions = consumer brand abandonment, stunted growth, and lost LTV
Many consumers hold brands responsible for payment fraud that occurs on their sites, leading to lost loyalty and lifetime value (LTV). This also has a negative impact on customer acquisition costs and opportunities for growth, forcing brands to spend precious time and resources on reactively putting out fires instead of proactively streamlining the customer experience or expanding to new customer bases.
More than two out of five (41%) consumers would permanently stop shopping with a brand if someone made an unauthorized transaction using their credit card or other payment information.
Failing to prevent fraudulent transactions costs a business more than just profits. Businesses often face fallout from consumers who were victims of fraud on their site, losing both their business and lifetime value, plus the cost of the merchandise or service and fees involved with processing the chargebacks. On top of this, companies with an unchecked chargeback rate of over 1% may be deemed high risk and be issued fees and restrictions from payment processors.
Rebecca Alter, Trust and Safety Architect at Sift
Preparing for the 2024 chargeback season
Cardholders commonly file chargeback claims 2-3 months after the initial charges were made, meaning holiday purchases typically lead to disputes being filed between January and March—also known as the universal chargeback season. And with 2023 global online Black Friday sales stronger than expected at an 8% uptick coming in at $70.9 billion, many merchants may face an increasing volume and value of disputes in the new year.
Merchants can reduce the number of chargebacks they face by having clear cancellation and return policies in place for the holidays. The Visa Compelling Evidence 3.0 update is also intended to help merchants better defend against first-party misuse.
Fighting first-party fraud with Visa CE 3.0
In response to rising chargeback rates, Visa has come out with an updated Compelling Evidence 3.0 (CE 3.0) policy designed to help merchants, acquirers, and issuers more successfully prove that a chargeback was fraudulent. The new guidelines expand the list of compelling evidence that can be submitted, allowing merchants to build a stronger case for themselves and reduce the money lost to illegitimate chargebacks, such as first-party fraud.
These compelling evidence rules require merchants to demonstrate a pattern of previous, non-disputed purchases by the cardholder, proving that the disputed transaction in question isn't the result ofthird-party fraud.
Leveraging smarter, faster fraud prevention from checkout to chargeback
Building dispute management into digital risk operations is more important than ever for companies facing abuse on multiple fronts. Businesses must implement a full-coverage solution in order to successfully protect the entire customer journey against all forms of payment fraud and achieve sustainable growth.
As the first-ever chargeback solution to use real-time machine learning, Sift Dispute Management helps identify missing evidence to streamline chargeback responses and increase win rates.
Combined with Sift Payment Protection, the solutions provide complete, end-to-end protection against payment fraud losses with a single, leading Digital Trust & Safety Platform. Risk teams can stop fraud at the source, win more disputes, and secure revenue by leveraging intelligent automation at every touchpoint.
Your information will be used to contact you about our service and subscribe you to our direct marketing communications. You can, of course,unsubscribe at any time. Please see our Website Privacy Notice.